A Study on the Sense of Security in the Old and New Urban Fabric of Chelleh Khaneh Neighborhood, Rasht
Abstract
Urban security is considered one of the key indicators of sustainable urban development, especially in neighborhoods with contrasting physical and social characteristics. This research aims to assess and compare the sense of security in the old and new urban fabric of Chelleh Khaneh Neighborhood in Rasht, based on the principles of Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED). The objective of this study is to conduct a comparative analysis of the level of security within the physical environment of the Chelleh Khaneh neighborhood in Rasht. This applied research employs a mixed-methods approach (both quantitative and qualitative), including field observations and spatial analysis in both parts of the neighborhood. The comparative analysis uses CPTED indicators to evaluate the physical features that influence the sense of security. The research question is: How have the principles of CPTED manifested in the old and new fabric of Chelleh Khaneh, and how do these differences affect residents' perception of security? The findings show that, despite organic spatial patterns and limited natural surveillance, the old fabric has higher social cohesion and more informal surveillance. In contrast, the new fabric benefits from better physical design elements, such as lighting and access control, but the lack of a sense of belonging and social ties negatively impacts residents' security perceptions. Key CPTED indicators, such as natural surveillance and territorial reinforcement, have shown different performances in these two urban fabrics. The innovation of this study lies in the integrated evaluation of CPTED principles within two different morphological contexts in a single neighborhood, providing practical insights for urban designers and policymakers to enhance urban security in both traditional and modern urban fabrics.
Keywords:
Comparative study, Security, Environmental factors, Chelleh Khaneh Neighborhood, RashtReferences
- [1] Takano, T., Morita, H., Nakamura, S., Togawa, T., Kachi, N., Kato, H., & Hayashi, Y. (2023). Evaluating the quality of life for sustainable urban development. Cities, 142, 104561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2023.104561
- [2] Salehi, E. (2012). The impacts of environmental factors in crime occurrence and safety of Tehran’s citizens. Crime, law and social change, 58(4), 457–467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-012-9392-z
- [3] Shach-Pinsly, D. (2019). Measuring security in the built environment: Evaluating urban vulnerability in a human-scale urban form. Landscape and urban planning, 191, 103412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.08.022
- [4] Wang, J., Long, R., Chen, H., & Li, Q. (2019). Measuring the psychological security of urban residents: Construction and validation of a new scale. Frontiers in psychology, 10, 2423. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02423
- [5] Marzbali, M. H., Abdullah, A., Abd Razak, N., & Tilaki, M. J. M. (2011). A review of the effectiveness of crime prevention by design approaches towards sustainable development. Journal of sustainable development, 4(1), 160. https://doi.org/10.5539/jsd.v4n1p160
- [6] Sejodi, M., Hataminejad, H., & Ghorbani, R. (2021). A Survey on the Environmental Security with Emphasis on CPTED Approach (Case Study: The Farhang Neighborhood of Rasht). Geographical studies of coastal areas journal, 2(2), 31–60. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22124/gscaj.2021.19653.1080
- [7] Istrate, A. L., Mitchell, A., Russell, P., & Murphy, S. (2024). Comparative analyses of publicness in urban squares within a diversifying metropolis. Urban design international, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41289-024-00256-1
- [8] Chen, Y., Ge, Y., Yang, G., Wu, Z., Du, Y., Mao, F., … others. (2022). Inequalities of urban green space area and ecosystem services along urban center-edge gradients. Landscape and urban planning, 217, 104266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104266
- [9] Yu, D., Fang, C., Xue, D., & Yin, J. (2014). Assessing urban public safety via indicator-based evaluating method: A systemic view of Shanghai. Social indicators research, 117(1), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0366-z
- [10] HasaniPour, H., Kazemi, A., & Saghafi Asl, A. (2024). Environmental quality indicators of urban open spaces in bagherabad neighborhood of Rasht, Iran. Geographical research, 39(4), 419–431. (In Persian). https://georesearch.ir/browse.php?a_id=1666&sid=1&slc_lang=en&html=1
- [11] Jacob, J. (1961). The death and life of great American. Cities. new york: vintage books. https://www.bol.com/nl/nl/f/the-death-and-life-of-great-american-cities/30162225/
- [12] Rojas, E. (2015, March). Housing policies, quality of housing and urban development lessons from the Latin American experience 1960–2010. In World bank conference on land and poverty, washington, DC (pp. 23-27). https://www.academia.edu/download/37741433/Rojas_Submision_737.pdf
- [13] Bratt, R. G. (2002). Housing and family well-being. Housing studies, 17(1), 13–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673030120105857
- [14] Peck, C., & Kay Stewart, K. (1985). Satisfaction with housing and quality of life. Home economics research journal, 13(4), 363–372. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077727X8501300403
- [15] Cozens, P., & Love, T. (2015). A review and current status of crime prevention through environmental design (CPTED). Journal of planning literature, 30(4), 393–412. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412215595440
- [16] Das, D. (2008). Urban quality of life: A case study of Guwahati. Social indicators research, 88(2), 297–310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-007-9191-6
- [17] Diprose, R. (2007). Physical safety and security: A proposal for internationally comparable indicators of violence. Oxford development studies, 35(4), 431–458. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600810701701913
- [18] Shapour, B., Ameneh, F., & others. (2013). Examining the factors affecting the sense of social security in cities (Case study: Kerman city). Urban Sociological Studies (Urban Studies), 3(6), 103-122. (In Persian). https://www.sid.ir/paper/210331/fa
- [19] Izadi, M. S, & Haqi, M. R. (2015). Improving the feeling of security in public spaces by using urban design. Case study: imam square in hamadan, 2(2), 5-12. (In Persian). https://www.sid.ir/fa/VEWSSID/J_pdf/38513940201.pdf
- [20] Nazmfar, H., Alavi, S., & Eshghi, A. (2018). Spatial analysis of security in parks of Tehran. Geographical urban planning research (gupr), 6(3), 491–510. https://doi.org/10.22059/jurbangeo.2018.246430.822
- [21] Ehsani Fard, A. A., Shoaei, H., & Maleki Shoja, K. (2013). Evaluating the level of citizens' sense of security in new cities, case study: the new city of Eshtehard. Urban and rural management, 11(31), 317-334. (In Persian). https://www.sid.ir/paper/92085/fa
- [22] Rezavian M. T., & Aghaei, P. (2014). Investigating and evaluating the feeling of social security in a case study neighborhood: (Comparative study of Jamaran and Fatemi neighborhoods). Zagros landscape geographic quarterly, 6(20), 43-57. (In Persian). https://www.sid.ir/paper/175696/fa?utm_source=chatgpt.com
- [23] Cozens, P. M. (2011). Urban planning and environmental criminology: Towards a new perspective for safer cities. Planning practice and research, 26(4), 481–508. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2011.582357
- [24] Thompson, S. K., & Gartner, R. (2007). Effective crime prevention in Toronto, Canada. Enhancing urban safety and security: global report on human settlements 2007. http://staging.unhabitat.org/downloads/docs/GRHS.2007.CaseStudy.Crime.Toronto.pdf
- [25] Abdullah, A., Abd Razak, N., Salleh, M. N. M., & Sakip, S. R. M. (2012). Validating crime prevention through environmental design using structural equation model. Procedia-social and behavioral sciences, 36, 591–601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.065
- [26] Crowe, T. D. (2000). Crime prevention through environmental design. National crime prevention institute. https://popcenter.asu.edu/sites/default/files/Responses/closing_streets/PDFs/Crowe_Zahm_1994.pdf
- [27] Saville, G., & Mihinjac, M. (2022). Third-generation CPTED—Integrating crime prevention and neighbourhood liveability. In Urban crime prevention: multi-disciplinary approaches (pp. 27–54). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15108-8_2